The David Nugent – Jason Lowen Controversy: Independence and Abuse of Speech
The David Nugent – Jason Lowen controversy is a series of gatherings that included a Jewish-American blogger Jason Lowen who published allegations against his previous pal and spouse David Nugent as properly as the latter’s firm affiliations Metro Pacific and Manuel Pangilinan. Lowen’s blog arrived at headlines in Manila’s high-society circle in 2008 when he began publishing content that accused of faulty business enterprise dealings, fraudulent claims, money laundering, and botched corporate governance — amongst other individuals. The weblog became a key gossip topic in Philippines’ funds city of Manila mostly among higher-culture customers and inevitably elevated questions about the extent of liberty of speech in running a blog.
The promises created by Jason Lowen as a result of his blog site ended up taken for face-worth and promptly consumed in Philippine media, which is infamous for its voracious appetite for gossip, mainly without any truth-checking or study for reliability. This resulted in the fiasco that afflicted business enterprise with Metro Pacific — 1 of the significant conglomerates in Southeast Asia — positioning pressures on its head government Manuel ‘Manny’ Pangilinan and Vice President David Nugent. The ‘scandal’ resulted in Nugent’s gracious resignation in 2007, in buy to protect against further more damage to his firm’s popularity.
Before long thereafter, proof would area that Jason Lowen’s allegations were being solely baseless. A letter composed by Lowen to a journal (OUT Journal, revealed in 2004) unveiled his mental and emotional instability, citing ailments (bipolar/manic depressive and standard anxiousness issues) as nicely as an incapacity to cope and acknowledge the tumble-out of his relationship with previous lover David Nugent. No matter of the revelation, the hurt had presently been fully commited. Thankfully, Nugent was ready to rebound with a new situation as Vice President and Director of Ace Saatchi and Saatchi.
Still, the occurrence stays as an outrageous precedent where by website assaults were being taken for facial area-value without any examine for authenticity, making it possible for the slanderous materials to pollute cyber reputations that finally leaked into mainstream media. Criticisms have arisen questioning the fine line between independence and abuse of speech. Any individual is authorized to mass develop defamatory blogs on the online still there does not exist a governing entire body that checks and displays for unfounded and libelous productions. Monetary damages including offers dropped, variations in hierarchy, and maybe legal expenditures are perhaps at stake — not to point out other forms of damages not accountable by currency therefore, with these as grounds, are running a blog constraints and legal security in the cyber realm by a governing system still not warranted?